Search for: "Li v. Coven"
Results 1 - 20
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2019, 9:52 am
Similarly, by analogy to Mac’s Shell Service, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
However, its distinction from the irreparable harm element lies in its focus on non-monetary harm. [read post]
26 May 2022, 9:40 am
Corp. for Urban Home Ownership of New Haven (Breach of contract, covenant of good faith and fair dealing, real estate agreement, management agreement, fraud, limited discovery and hearing on motion to open judgment.); Li v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 1:35 pm
Where there has been both the sale of a business and an employment relationship, the difficulty lies in determining whether the restrictive covenant should be construed as relating to the business transaction or to the employment contract. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 12:20 am
” The more lasting lesson for practitioners of VC Glasscock’s opinion lies in its thorough explanation of the covenant’s basic principles and the factors considered by courts when applying them. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:58 pm
The Chancery Court was asked to review restrictive covenants in a partnership agreement in Ainslie v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:38 am
McInnis v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:24 am
Narrowstep, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 3:54 am
On the Attwood approach, severance of a covenant is permitted only where the covenant was, in effect, a combination of several different covenants rather than a single covenant. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 10:14 am
Take, for example, a case out of Nebraska - Farm Credit Svcs. of America v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:45 am
In that recent case, Ace Precision v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:16 pm
See, e.g., Vela v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
In Autodesk, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
McGhee and Hurd v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 9:37 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 10:30 pm
First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Charleston v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:12 am
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of Geico’s motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the cause of action for punitive damages against it because “no separate cause of action for punitive damages lies for pleading purposes” (Crown Fire Supply Co., Inc. v Cronin, 306 AD2d 430, 431; see Podesta v Assumable Homes Dev. [read post]
A Lawsuit Seeking The Transfer Of Title In Real Property Is Only In County Where Property Is Located
10 Dec 2009, 1:13 pm
English v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 7:34 pm
Further, agreements between former partners divvying-up clients (or other covenants not to compete) are largely unenforceable because they are seen as improperly limiting clients ability to choose their lawyer. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:00 pm
" In ProTherapy & Associates, LLC v. [read post]
